• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) S. 80 - Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (2 of 2006) S. 18(4) - Jurisdiction under sub-section (4), the Council would have jurisdiction as there is a specific averment made by the private respondent that it has an office in Chandigarh - The argument that no supplies had been made in Chandigarh is without any basis since the jurisdiction clause does not talk about any cause of action on account of a business dealing having occurred in Chandigarh but gives a wider jurisdiction to a supplier who is located where the Council has jurisdiction - Reference to the clause of jurisdiction of Pune Courts would accordingly be without any basis since the Statute extends the jurisdiction to the Council to the place where the supplier has its office and, therefore, no fault can be found as such to the order passed by the council. (182) P.L.R.

Register SCeJ  Free Updates*

Supreme Court e@journal

Subscribe or take a 4 week FREE trial 

Note: Please fill out the fields marked with an asterisk.