• Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) S.  96, Order 23, Rule 3-A, Order 47, Rule 1, Order 43, Rule 1 - No separate suit lies against a decree passed on the basis of compromise in view of the bar created under Order 23, Rule 3-A CPC and an appeal is maintainable against an order allowing the application for review in the light of provisions of Order 47 Rule 7 and Order 43 Rule 1  CPC - As the petitioners did not prefer an application for review, the respondent cannot maintain an appeal even by invoking the provisions of Order 47 Rule 7 read with Order 43 Rule 1 CPC much less under Section 96 CPC.  (183) P.L.R.
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) S.  96, Order 47, Rule 7, Order 43 - Petitioners filed the application for setting aside the award of the Lok Adalat on the ground of fraud by invoking Section 151 CPC dealing with inherent jurisdiction of Court - Cannot be construed or deemed to be an application for review and thus allowing of the said application would entitle the respondent to prefer an appeal by invoking Rule 7 of Order 47 First Appellate Court has not been filed under Order 47, Rule 7 read with Order 43 CPC but the same has been filed by invoking Section 96 CPC - Which was not maintainable.  (183) P.L.R.
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) S.  96 - No appeal lies under Section 96 CPC by a defendant against a judgment by which a suit is dismissed simply because one of the issues is decided in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. (174) P.L.R. (Del.)