Criminal Trial - In the case of circumstantial evidence, if two views are possible on the case of record, one pointing to the guilt of the accused and the other his innocence -  The accused is indeed entitled to have the benefit of one which is favourable to him - The appel-lants are thus entitled to the benefit of doubt.  2019 SCeJournal 68

• Criminal Trial - That in case there are two views which can be culled out from the perusal of evidence and application of law, the view which favours the accused should be taken - It has been recognized as a human right by this Court.  (2016)3 SCEJ 562
• Criminal trial - The golden thread which runs through the web of administration of justice in criminal cases is that if two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case, one pointing to the guilt of the accused and the other to his innocence, the view which is favourable to the accused should be adopted. (2018)2 SCeJ 1157