1. Haryana Stamp (Prevention of under Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 1978, Rule 4 - Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) S. 47A(4) - Respondents could have reacted to the deficiency of Stamp fee on the sale deed within a period of three years from the date of sale deed. (177) P.L.R.  
  2. Haryana Stamp (Prevention of under Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 1978, Rule 4 - Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) S. 47A(4) - Respondents could have reacted to the deficiency of Stamp fee on the sale deed within a period of three years from the date of sale deed. Sanjay Gupta  v. State of Haryana . (177) P.L.R.  
  3. Haryana Stamp (Prevention of Under Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 1978 - Appeal - Dismissed in default - Restoration of - Advocate for the petitioners had fallen ill on the relevant date and thereafter had left his practice, owing to his illness - He has not informed the petitioners about the dismissal of their appeals in default - Thus, the illness of a counsel, to my mind, is sufficient ground to restore their appeals - Moreover, it is now well settled principle of law that the legal rights and liabilities of the parties should be decided on merits by the Courts, instead of dismissing them on technical ground, which would naturally occasion miscarriage of justice to the concerned party - Moreover, the petitioners cannot be blamed/penalized for illness of their counsel - Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) S. 40(A). (174) P.L.R.