• Industrial Policy, 1988 (Punjab) - Declining the request of the petitioner for grant of Capital Investment subsidy - State government was to pay 10% of the subsidy and the Central Government used to pay 15% of the capital investment - Since the scheme issued by the Central government was discontinued - It has has nowhere been recorded in the impugned order that why the claim of the petitioner could not be considered for 10% capital investment subsidy, which was to be paid by the respondent-State in view of its Industrial Policy 1988. M/s Shorewala Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd.  V.  The State of Haryana. (173) P.L.R.  

Register SCeJ  Free Updates*


Supreme Court e@journal
PUNJAB LAW REPORTER


Subscribe or take a 4 week FREE trial 

Note: Please fill out the fields marked with an asterisk.